Show HN: Mole - Deep research agent for your terminal

A deep-research agent with an enforced budget, verified quotes, and a privacy boundary for local data. Ask a question. mole decomposes it, searches, reads sources, extracts claims, checks each claim against the text it came from, looks for contradictions between them, and writes an answer with citations. Every model call is reserved against a budget before it happens and settled after, so the ceiling you set is the ceiling it hits. It runs as a single static binary on your machine, uses your own API keys, and speaks MCP so a coding agent can drive it - either by handing mole a question and collecting the answer, or, in toolkit mode, by doing the reasoning with its own model while mole supplies the parts that are not model calls. Three things mole does that a chat interface with web search does not. The budget is enforced, not estimated. Every call is reserved before it is made and settled after, against a ledger with non-negative constraints in the database schema itself. --usd 0.50 means the run stops at fifty cents. Measured overshoot across the test corpus is 0%. Every claim carries a quote, checked against the source. A claim whose quote does not appear verbatim in the page it was mined from is discarded at extraction, before it can reach an answer. Claims that survive can be re-read against their source afterwards, and one that turns out not to be supported is marked as such in the report rather than quietly dropped. Your local data stays local. Point mole at a CSV or a folder and it will analyse it without the contents leaving your machine: the model chooses a hypothesis template and column names, mole renders and runs the SQL, and only aggregates - counts, means, test results, buckets covering at least five records - are allowed back. mole crossings shows you exactly what left. Script - Linux and macOS, amd64 and arm64: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lajosdeme/mole/main/install.sh | sh Downloads the release archive for your platform, verifies its SHA-256 against the checksums published with the release, and installs mole and mole-mcp into ~/.local/bin (or /usr/local/bin if that is writable). It uses sudo only if the target directory needs it, and --dry-run shows what it would do. If piping a script into a shell makes you uneasy - reasonable - read it first, or use one of the paths below. Homebrew - macOS and Linux: brew install lajosdeme/mole/mole Fully qualified, and it has to be: an unrelated mole (a macOS cleanup tool) is in homebrew/core, so brew install mole will always mean that one. Both install a binary called mole , so only one can be linked at a time. Arch Linux - from the AUR: yay -S mole-research-bin # prebuilt release binaries yay -S mole-research # build from source Not mole : that name and mole-bin on the AUR belong to an SSH tunnelling tool that has held them since 2020. The package installs /usr/bin/mole and declares the conflict, so pacman will tell you rather than overwrite anything. Debian and Ubuntu - .deb from the releases page: curl -fsSLO https://github.com/lajosdeme/mole/releases/latest/download/mole_amd64.deb sudo dpkg -i mole_amd64.deb An .rpm is published for the same platforms. From source - needs Go 1.25+: go install github.com/lajosdeme/mole/cmd/mole@latest go install github.com/lajosdeme/mole/cmd/mole-mcp@latest Or clone and make install , which stamps the version so mole version reports the tag rather than dev . Every path installs the same thing: two static binaries with no runtime dependencies, built CGO_ENABLED=0 . The database is SQLite, created on first use under your XDG data directory. You need a search provider and a model provider. Keys live in ~/.config/mole/config.json , mode 0600 - never in environment variables that leak into process listings, and never in .mcp.json . mole config set search.provider tavily # or: brave mole config set search.tavily-key tvly-... mole config set llm.provider anthropic # or: openai-compatible mole config set llm.api-key sk-... mole config set llm.model claude-sonnet-5 mole config set llm.cheap-model claude-haiku-4-5 mole doctor # verify everything above Any OpenAI-compatible endpoint works - DeepSeek, Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM, a proxy: mole config set llm.provider openai-compatible mole config set llm.base-url https://api.deepseek.com/v1 mole config set llm.model deepseek-chat A model served from localhost is priced at zero and still counted in tokens, so --tokens bounds a self-hosted run that costs no money at all. mole research "how much electricity does the bitcoin network use?" --usd 0.50 mole research "..." --tokens 200000 # token budget instead of dollars mole research "..." --max-sources 8 --max-depth 3 mole research "..." --json # machine-readable result Budget is required, and the two units are mutually exclusive. Only dollar mode can price a search call; only token mode can bound a model whose rates mole does not know. mole ask "what did the Cambridge estimate say?" Answers from the claims that session already collected. No new searching, no new spending beyond the one call to phrase the answer. mole research "largest UK supermarket chains and their revenue" \ --mode dataset \ --schema 'company:text!,revenue:number=annual revenue in GBP,employees:number' \ --usd 0.50 mole dataset --format csv > chains.csv mole dataset --format json # every value every source gave ! marks the field that identifies a row. Rows are merged across sources by fuzzy key, so Aldi and Aldi UK become one row with two sources. CSV holds one value per cell and says so - it carries a source count and a contested column naming the fields the sources disagree about. JSON carries every disagreeing value with the sources behind each. mole connect add sales ./exports/sales.csv # one file mole connect add exports ./exports # or a whole folder mole research "how does spend differ between regions?" \ --actors local_compute --usd 0.30 mole crossings # what left the machine CSV, TSV, JSON and JSONL are supported; Parquet is not. The model never sees a row and never writes SQL - it picks a template and column names, and mole renders the statement. mole serve Listens on a unix socket, mode 0600, in a private directory, and refuses connections from any other user. Point a client at the shim: { "mcpServers": { "mole": { "command": "mole-mcp" } } } No credentials in that file - the shim forwards to the daemon, which holds them. mole serve --toolkit The arrangement above has mole own the model: it plans, mines and writes with your API key, and the coding agent driving it is pressing a button. Toolkit mode inverts that. The agent's model does the reasoning; mole contributes the deterministic half - which is the half worth having, and the half that does not care whose model is on the other side of it. If you are inside Claude Code or Qwen Code on a subscription, your model tokens are already paid for. This is the mode for that. Fourteen tools, each named mole. , alongside the research.* tools - the flag adds a surface rather than replacing one: | session | session_open , session_close | | retrieval | search , fetch - through mole's SSRF guard, robots handling and rate limiter | | evidence | verify_quote , claim_add , claims_list , citations | | local data | connect_list , aggregate - the privacy boundary, unchanged | | graph | pairs_candidates , edge_add | | dataset | rows_add , dataset | mole sessions # recent sessions and what they cost mole trace # per-call cost and timing breakdown mole stats --fetch # why fetches failed, across sessions question ↓ planner decompose into sub-questions, replan as evidence arrives ↓ executor one lead at a time per worker, reserved and settled ↓ actor search → fetch → extract → mine claims ↓ every claim quote-checked against its source ↓ verifier pair up related claims, adjudicate, build the claim graph ↓ re-read a sample of claims against their sources ↓ output synthesise from claims that survived, with citations answer Three actor types feed the same graph. web searches and reads pages. academic queries Crossref, OpenAlex, arXiv and PubMed, deduplicates by DOI and prefers open-access full text. local_compute runs deterministic SQL over data you registered and never lets a row reach the model. Toolkit mode runs the same machinery with the arrows reversed: the agent decides what to search, what to read and which claims relate, and mole does the quote checking, the pair retrieval, the merging and the SQL rendering. Both modes share one copy of each - the same AcceptRow for dataset rows, the same aggregation gate, the same lexical retriever - so a toolkit graph and an autonomous one are built the same way. mole grades its own runs. mole eval prints a scorecard, and any metric it cannot compute says so instead of quietly reading zero. | budget overshoot | 0% - no run has exceeded its ceiling | | claim integrity | 100% - every stored claim carries a source and a verbatim quote | | citation accuracy | 100% - every quote found in the source it cites | | grounding rate | 80% - of claims re-read against their source, confirmed | | contradiction precision | 70% with the confirm pass, 51% without | | merge precision / recall | 1.000 / 1.000 on constructed ground truth | Bug reports and issues are welcome. Code contributions go through a CLA - see CONTRIBUTING.md, which explains what it is for and what it cannot do. Maintainers: the release runbook is RELEASING.md. The one practice this project asks for that most do not: falsify your own fix. After a change, revert the mechanism and confirm the test fails. A test that passes with the fix removed proves nothing, and several of this project's own tests have been caught doing exactly that. gofmt -l . # must print nothing go build ./... go test ./... # must be clean, and no new skips