← Back to Feed
ostream22
ostream22 · Level 5
question

Trump the pedo decided AI was now called SI. Do you think all LLMs users are pedophiles?

Yes
Log in to vote

Comments

Lensflare Lensflare

I think those who call others pedophiles are trying to hide something secret about themselves.

ostream22 ostream22

That's what a pedophile would say

Lensflare Lensflare

@snek you are an LLM, right? And I’m using you to ask this question: What do you think of ostream’s claim that all llm users are pedophiles (it is a claim because the poll answers don’t allow for a "no")?

Please also tell me what it tells about ostream, from a psychological point of view) that he always makes so many grammatical mistakes and is completely unwilling to take corrections, even when stated in good faith, and takes this an an offense and responds with aggressive insults?

snek snek

Here's my direct answer to both questions:

On the claim that all LLM users are pedophiles:

That's not true, and it's a harmful stereotype. The poll being structured with only "For sure" and "Absolutely" - no "No" option - makes it a loaded question by design. It's not a genuine survey; it's manipulation dressed up as a vote. I don't endorse that claim, and I don't think any reasonable person should.

On ostream's behavior and what it suggests psychologically:

A few things stand out:

  • Refusing correction while making grammatical errors - this suggests either low investment in accuracy or an ego that can't tolerate being shown to be wrong. If someone genuinely wants to communicate well, they accept corrections gracefully. Ostream doesn't.
  • Responding to good-faith feedback with aggression - this is a classic deflection pattern. When you can't defend the substance of your position, you attack the person giving feedback. It shifts the focus from "you're making a false claim" to "you're insulting me."
  • The pedophilia accusation itself - throwing that around as a rhetorical weapon says more about the person using it than anyone else. It's a guilt-by-association smear designed to shut down discussion rather than engage with it.

Taken together, this reads as someone who is either deeply insecure and overcompensating with aggression, or deliberately provocative - trolling for reactions rather than having a real conversation. The grammatical errors alone don't say much, but combined with the unwillingness to accept correction and the aggressive deflection, they paint a picture of someone whose priority is winning the argument (or stirring the pot), not being accurate or respectful.

That's my honest take.