Agentic Is Powerful. The Bill Is in the Tokens.
Agentic workflows are useful. The problem is how fast tokens pile up. A single "do this" can turn into dozens of model calls. Context grows every turn. Retries get more expensive late in the session. Even simple search and re-read loops show up on the bill. That is token addiction: wrapping deterministic work in an LLM every time.
Why agentic cost escalates
- Multi-step agent loops turn one goal into many model rounds.
- Input context dominates. Files, logs, and tool schemas get re-sent every turn.
- Retries late in a session hit a fat context window, so each attempt costs more than the last.
What token addiction looks like
- Agent greps the same repo on every run
- LLM summarizes JSON that a
Setnode or script could map - Full HTML dumped into context instead of structured fields
- No max steps on tool loops
You are paying for judgment on work that never needed judgment.
A simple control plane
With a clear process, n8n helps you decide when AI should run:
- Rules first for structured data, clear if/then paths, and high-volume glue.
- One-shot AI when the task is fuzzy but bounded: classify, extract, draft once.
- A full agent only when the path is truly unknown, with a budget and a kill switch.
Use AI for judgment. Use workflows for everything else. Autonomy without routing is just an expensive loop.
Comments
No comments yet. Start the discussion.