"Make me an offer" is how pre-revenue apps die on marketplaces

Why "Open to Offers" Fails for Pre-Revenue Apps

"Make me an offer" is how pre-revenue apps die on marketplaces. I've watched hundreds of no-revenue side projects get listed for sale. The single most common listing strategy - "$0 MRR, open to offers" - is also the one that reliably kills the sale. Here's the mechanics of why, and what actually moves these assets.

Why doesn't "open to offers" work for a no-revenue app? Because a pre-revenue app has no anchor price, and buyers won't invent one for you. With no MRR there's no multiple, so every buyer's first question - "what's it worth?" - has no default answer. "Open to offers" transfers the pricing work to the person with the least information and the most alternatives. They scroll past instead.

Data point: Microns, a marketplace specifically for micro-startups, moved ~90 startups for about $4,300 average ($390K GMV over three years). Its own founder, Ilya Novohatskyi, put it plainly: "Buyers don't tend to pay well for pre-revenue SaaS projects." Classifieds-style listings structurally under-price this asset class.

What a Pre-Revenue App Is Actually Worth

One paragraph, no mysticism: a no-revenue product is priced off replacement cost - the developer-hours to rebuild it times an hourly rate, discounted 40-70% because the buyer takes on your unproven demand. A 160-hour build at $60/hr is $9,600 of labor; after a 55% discount the realistic anchor is ~$4,300. Real assets riding along (domain, waitlist, users, unique data) move it up from there.

Observed bands from 2026 sales:

• Idea + domain: $0–$500
• Working product, no users: $500–$3,000
• Product + waitlist/early users: $2,000–$10,000
• Product + distribution assets: $5,000–$25,000+

Real comps: Recover (SaaS) sold at $4,500 against a $4,000 ask; Microns floor deals ran $500 (content site) to $1,500 (crypto tool).

Why Auctions Beat Negotiation for This Asset

This isn't marketplace marketing - it's a 30-year-old economics result. Bulow & Klemperer (1996) showed a public auction with just one extra bidder beats even a well-run negotiation. Later work (Vasu, University of Houston) sharpened the condition: the more uncertain the valuation, the more of the asset's price is discovered - not negotiated. A $0-MRR app is the maximum-uncertainty case.

Fixed-price listings ask you to guess the number and defend it; bidding lets the market locate it. That's the whole reason timed auctions exist for this category.

(Disclosure: I work on ExitBid, which runs 5-day pre-revenue auctions - $199 flat, 0% commission, free bidding. Free boards work fine for sub-$2K projects; the point above holds wherever competitive bids exist.)

The 3 Numbers to Put in Your Listing Instead of "Open to Offers"

• Rebuild cost - hours × rate, shown as arithmetic. Buyers can argue your rate, but they can't scroll past a number.
• A floor price - even a low one. Floors convert lurkers into first bids; "no reserve" without a starting point converts nobody.
• One demand signal with a date - "300 waitlist signups since March" beats three paragraphs about the vision.

If you want the full method with the comps table: how to value a pre-revenue project, or run yours through the valuation calculator.