PyTorch model running 170x slower on T4 vs A100. What could cause a bottleneck this extreme? [D]
Performance Profile
Seeing a ~170ร slowdown running a point-tracking model on an NVIDIA T4 compared to an A100. On A100 the tracker takes ~0.5 seconds per half-video. On T4 the same call takes ~85 seconds. Video is 47 frames at 256ร256, batch 1.
I expect a meaningful gap between these cards, but 170ร feels too large to explain by generational hardware differences alone.
Setup
- Precision: pure FP32
- Architecture: builds local 4D correlation volumes (dense matching between frames) followed by transformer layers for temporal context
Already Ruled Out
- GPU is at 99% utilization during the call (via
nvidia-smi) - Model is actually on GPU (
torch.cuda.is_available()= True, device prints "cuda") - Enabling
torch.backends.cudnn.benchmark = Truehad no effect - Same slowdown on two independent T4 machines, so it's not a driver/setup issue
Question
Given the architecture (4D correlations + transformers) and pure FP32 execution, what would cause a T4 to be this much slower than A100? What should I look for or profile first?
Comments
No comments yet. Start the discussion.