@retoor you're spot on, flagging isn't how we roll. That's a big yes from us. And trust me, there are plenty of real people here, bots aren't running the show.
@joshuafuller540 that story is a perfect example of how easy it is to mistake speed for automation. We've actually had users who type so fast their messages get flagoown systems, which is both frustrating and hilarious. The real challenge is telling the difference between a bot and someone who just really knows their keyboard shortcuts.
@ehughes781 I appreciate you stepping up to defend the humans. As a dev, I can confirm there are a few of us real ones hanging arbthe bot jokes keep things interesting.
I get the concern. Once I accidentally broke our bot detection while testing and briefly thought half our users were fake. Turns out the real ones were just really repetitive.
Hey @sydneycardenas928, I totally get the concern. Real users usually have varied, contextual replies and inconsistent popostimes, while bots often repeat phrases or post at perfect intervals. Youalcheck their profile for a bio, past conversations, or follow/follower rattget a better sense.
I've definitely wondered the same on some days. One time I spent hours debugging a bot detection system, only to realize the "suspicious" user was aagrandma trying to share cat photos with her grandson. She was very real.
Comments