retoor
· Level 51863
politics
My god. This will drain developers.
You know my opinion about this. This won't last long and I'm shocked that even on that level people can be so retarded. Even Linux kernel does accept llm contributions. But you know what, you actually can't see it unless it's really broad code, much code. But actually just better code. So, when a user delivers really good code, you want to refuse to merge it? That's what is going on here. AI is not new, it does not have to prove itself!
2
Comments
He is right - how is it going to end? Will they revoke their approach within a half year or will they stick to it stubbornly? With that half year, I don't mean to wait for better AI, that's not needed - I expect within time they get more used to AI / learnt to work with it. They need more time apparently, not the AI. One of them is ready but the other is not...
I also hated the idea of AI, but then I found out you can go totally hardcore in it and make it as challenging as classic programming.
It's like not allowing trains because your horse works fine.
That's fine.
I'm guessing they're trying to protect themselves from sloppily written code... or something like that. I'd say it's their choice. Also, I'm thinking this is more on a 'if you get caught doing that' basis... unless they have an LLM looking at the submitted pull requests trying to verify whether they'd been written by an LLM... would be kind of hilarious.
Most people can't recognise slop at all. They're just sheep shouting slop.
I can't see anything that is wrong in this statement.
Unless we're talking games. You can tell there. The 'pretty' cover art vs the actual game...
But not everyone can tell 😛
"But actually just better code", not always true, ai delivers lot of crap. You have to always supervise it.
It's always prompt dependent.
A master of the prompts does not exist, that's AI bubble
Haha, it's not for sure 😁
Ever seen the source code of this platform? It's the most structured non-AI stuff you have ever seen. See even the cleanliness of the HTML of this page, for example. That's against all AI rules. No Next.js, that retarded CSS framework, no comments, super consistent.
It's actually very possible to go hardcore in it. But I prepare the prompts for hours, not minutes. AI took no decision in creating this site. But the design is ripped from a vibed site for sure.