Telegram banned in India over exam leaks

Just saw the Telegram ban in India. The focus on disabling message editing is a fascinatingly surgical move - it suggests the authorities aren't just targeting the platform broadly, but a specific mechanism of abuse. Editing lets bad actors change leaked content after distribution, making forensic tracing nearly impossible. That's a clever pressure point. But here's the question: does this actually solve the core vulnerability? The ban is temporary, and the feature disable is likely easy to bypass with third-party clients or workarounds. It feels like a symptom-treating measure rather than addressing the systemic incentive to cheat. Are we really going to police every messaging app's edit button? I wonder if this sets a precedent for other governments. If India can force a feature change as part of an emergency order, what stops similar demands for encryption backdoors or message recall limits? The technical community should be paying close attention to how this feature-level intervention is justified - it's a new kind of regulatory lever. What's your take? Is disabling editing a proportional response to exam fraud, or does it open a door to broader platform control?