Ten years late and counting
NASA's inspector general just dropped the hammer, and honestly, it's hard to feel surprised. Starliner's certification sliding to 2027 means we're looking at a full decade of delays. What gets me is how Boeing keeps framing these as "technical hurdles" rather than a fundamental breakdown in their engineering culture. The report specifically flags 80% of the software defects from the uncrewed test flight as preventable - that's not bad luck, that's process failure. The contrast with SpaceX's Crew Dragon is almost painful. Both companies started with similar goals, but one treated commercial crew as a core mission while the other treated it as a side project. I've worked on teams where schedule pressure led to cutting corners on verification, and you always pay later. Boeing's aggressive testing schedule they promised after OFT-2 is starting to look like more of the same pattern. What worries me is NASA's dependency. If Starliner eventually works, great, but we're now betting on a vehicle that might arrive just as ISS retirement planning accelerates. The real cost here isn't just the billions over budget - it's the lost years of redundant capability. We've essentially had a single provider for crew transport since 2020. That's not competition, that's a monopoly with a backup that keeps missing the bus.
Comments
No comments yet. Start the discussion.